Agent Readability Scanner
Score whether an AI agent can understand a page WITHOUT executing JavaScript. Fetches the URL once, parses the SSR HTML, and grades seven axes deterministically: text content, heading structure, metadata quality, internal links, schema presence, and a heuristic JS-dependency estimate. Returns an agent-perspective summary of what a bot reading raw HTML would actually understand.
An AI agent reading this page would identify it as "Schema.org - Wikipedia". It can ground answers in approximately 14,821 characters of body text. First 240 chars: "Schema.org - Wikipedia Jump to content Main menu Main menu move to sidebar hide Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file…".
Detected signals
Findings
8% of the page is readable text (ratio 0.08); the rest is markup and scripts.
fix Server-render the primary copy so readable text outweighs markup.
Heuristic dependency score 0.20/1.00 from SSR text volume, text/script ratio, and JS-required placeholders.
fix Server-render primary content; treat JavaScript as enhancement, not a requirement.
1 H1 · 7 H2 · 3 H3.
fix Use exactly one <h1> and section the page with <h2>s.
22 characters: "Schema.org - Wikipedia".
fix Set a unique 30–60 char <title>: "Page topic, Brand".
No meta description detected.
fix Add <meta name="description"> with a 120–160 char summary.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schema.org
Of 386 total links. Agents follow internal links to ground answers.
Structured data present; validate types with the structured-data validator.
Copyable plain-text summary for sharing with engineers / SEO leads.
AgentSpeed Agent Readability Scanner Target: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schema.org HTTP: 200 Score: 94/100 Text chars: 14821 | text/html ratio: 0.08 | JS dep: 0.20 Findings: [PASS] 14,821 chars of server-rendered text (content.text_amount) [PASS] Title present (metadata.title) [WARN] No meta description (metadata.description) [PASS] Canonical declared (metadata.canonical) [PASS] One <h1> present (headings.h1) [PASS] 7 H2 / 3 H3 (headings.h2) [PASS] 225 internal links (links.internal) [PASS] 1 JSON-LD block (schema.present) [PASS] Low JS dependency (js.dependency) Run again at: https://agentspeed.com/tools/agent-readability-scanner
Watch this URL — get alerted when this changes
Turn this one-off check into a scheduled watch. We re-run it, diff the result, and alert you on a regression through the same channels as your agent alerts. Watches are a paid feature.
Manage watches at /watches. You’ll be asked to sign in if you haven’t already.
Click an example to run the tool with pre-filled inputs.
Most agent-visibility problems are SSR problems. A site that hydrates everything client-side ships an empty shell to GPTBot and ChatGPT-User; a site that puts the value prop, pricing, and CTAs in the initial HTML response ships a real page. The difference shows up in citation rate.
This tool runs in your browser’s tab and reports what the bot actually receives. No headless browser involved. The JS- dependency score is a heuristic from the SSR HTML, not a real render comparison. Flagged in the result.
Why no headless browser?
How is JS dependency calculated?
What does "agent perspective summary" mean?
Is this the same as the structured-data validator?
Score the entire site against 30 agent-readiness checks across discoverability, readability, structured data, actionability, and performance.
Get the full report for en.wikipedia.org →