Loading the report. A first-ever scan of a domain runs live against the site and takes about ten seconds.
Loading the report. A first-ever scan of a domain runs live against the site and takes about ten seconds.
This is how AI agents (not browsers) experience website.com. The score weights five categories of machine-readability; the ticks on the arc are the 36 individual checks behind it.
Incomplete measurement: only 50% of the rubric's weight produced results (2 of 5 categories), so no grade is shown. The score covers only what was measured.
Checks tagged “emerging” are 2026 agent-protocol standards most of the web hasn’t adopted yet. Adopting early is an edge, not a defect.
No reachable sitemap.xml. Publish one and reference it in robots.txt.
Show me exactly what to doA sitemap is a machine-readable list (sitemap.xml) of every page on your site. It is how crawlers find pages that aren’t linked from your homepage.
Agents discovering your site crawl outward from the pages they know. Without a sitemap, anything not linked from a top-level page (docs, older articles, product variants) may simply never be read, so it can’t be quoted or recommended.
Get it in your inbox now, plus a heads-up whenever website.com’s agent-readiness score changes. Free, unsubscribe anytime.
Prefer we just watch it for you? Monitor rescans weekly and emails what changed, $29/mo. Start monitoring →
Generated, ready-to-ship files for the gaps above. Copy them, or download and drop them into your repo.
This graded your homepage. Your pricing, docs, and checkout live on other pages: the ones assistants actually quote when they recommend you. A 15/100 here means agents are already missing things on the page you polish most. The $29 Deep Scan audits the whole site against all 36 checks, then emails a PDF with every failing check and its exact fix, ranked by what costs you the most visibility. One-time, delivered in minutes, no subscription.
Embed this badge on your site. It links back to this live scan and updates on every rescan.
<a href="https://agentspeed.com/scan/website.com"><img src="https://agentspeed.com/badge/website.com" alt="AgentSpeed agent-readiness score" height="56"></a>Get this report by email, then a heads-up when website.com’s agent-readiness actually changes: a check regressing, or the composite dropping.
Two things never trigger an email: a score change caused by us publishing a new rubric, because that is a different instrument rather than a change to your site, and movement explained only by timing-derived checks, which shift run to run on a site nobody touched.
Want it on your own schedule, with Slack or a webhook instead of email? Score-drift monitoring is on every paid plan.
This score says whether an AI agent could read website.com. AI traffic analytics says whether one actually came, and which pages turned it away.
Running AI agents of your own? AgentSpeed also monitors them in production: every run, its latency, cost, and failures, with alerts when something breaks. Free for 10,000 events a month, no credit card.
Paste into Claude Code, Cursor, or any assistant with your repository open. It carries this finding, the steps, and the shortcuts to avoid.
Terminal HTTP 403.
Show me exactly what to doBefore reading anything, an agent has to reach your page: one request, a clean answer. Yours didn’t answer cleanly. The finding above says exactly what happened: an error status, a connection failure, or a chain of redirects before any content arrived.
Agents give up much faster than browsers. A human waits through three redirects and a retry; an agent on a time budget records "unreachable" and answers from other sources. Every other measurement on this page happens only after this one succeeds, so this failure hides everything else your site does right.
Paste into Claude Code, Cursor, or any assistant with your repository open. It carries this finding, the steps, and the shortcuts to avoid.
No reachable robots.txt at the site root. Publish one so agents can discover your crawl policy and sitemap.
Show me exactly what to doYour site has no robots.txt file at all. That file is the front-door sign for every robot: what to read, what to skip, and where your sitemap lives.
Without one, every crawler guesses. Most treat a missing file as "allowed", but you lose the one place to point them at your sitemap and to state your policy explicitly. An explicit welcome is a clearer signal than silence.
Paste into Claude Code, Cursor, or any assistant with your repository open. It carries this finding, the steps, and the shortcuts to avoid.
No Content-Signal directives. Add e.g. `Content-Signal: ai-train=no, ai-summarize=yes` to declare granular AI usage policy beyond binary allow/disallow.
Show me exactly what to doContent-Signal is a newer robots.txt directive (pushed by Cloudflare) that lets you state a granular AI policy: for example "don’t train on my content, but summarising it in answers is fine". Classic robots.txt only offers all-or-nothing per crawler; this adds the middle ground. We looked for a Content-Signal line in your robots.txt and response headers and found none.
Without a granular signal, crawlers infer your intent from blunt allow/block rules, and sites often block more than they mean to just to avoid training use. A declared signal lets you keep answer visibility (summaries, citations) while opting out of what you object to. This is an emerging standard: honoring is voluntary and adoption is early, which is why it is flagged as emerging and weighs little.
Paste into Claude Code, Cursor, or any assistant with your repository open. It carries this finding, the steps, and the shortcuts to avoid.
One prompt covering the fixes above that have a step-by-step plan, in the same priority order, with the same guardrails.
This scan shows whether an agent can read the site. One free probe asks a real assistant a real buying question and records who it cited.