Loading the report. A first-ever scan of a domain runs live against the site and takes about ten seconds.
Loading the report. A first-ever scan of a domain runs live against the site and takes about ten seconds.
This is how AI agents (not browsers) experience prosafesystems.com. The score weights five categories of machine-readability; the ticks on the arc are the 36 individual checks behind it.
Send this to whoever edits the site. The link shows the score and grade as a preview card, and it stays current: it re-reads the latest scan rather than freezing today’s number.
Checks tagged “emerging” are 2026 agent-protocol standards most of the web hasn’t adopted yet. Adopting early is an edge, not a defect.
No reachable sitemap.xml. Publish one and reference it in robots.txt.
Show me exactly what to doA sitemap is a machine-readable list (sitemap.xml) of every page on your site. It is how crawlers find pages that aren’t linked from your homepage.
Agents discovering your site crawl outward from the pages they know. Without a sitemap, anything not linked from a top-level page (docs, older articles, product variants) may simply never be read, so it can’t be quoted or recommended.
Get it in your inbox now, plus a heads-up whenever prosafesystems.com’s agent-readiness score changes. Free, unsubscribe anytime.
Prefer we just watch it for you? Monitor rescans weekly and emails what changed, $29/mo. Start monitoring →
Generated, ready-to-ship files for the gaps above. Copy them, or download and drop them into your repo.
This graded your homepage. Your pricing, docs, and checkout live on other pages: the ones assistants actually quote when they recommend you. A 71/100 here means agents are already missing things on the page you polish most. The $29 Deep Scan audits the whole site against all 36 checks, then emails a PDF with every failing check and its exact fix, ranked by what costs you the most visibility. One-time, delivered in minutes, no subscription.
Embed this badge on your site. It links back to this live scan and updates on every rescan.
<a href="https://agentspeed.com/scan/prosafesystems.com"><img src="https://agentspeed.com/badge/prosafesystems.com" alt="AgentSpeed agent-readiness score" height="56"></a>Get this report by email, then a heads-up when prosafesystems.com’s agent-readiness actually changes: a check regressing, or the composite dropping.
Two things never trigger an email: a score change caused by us publishing a new rubric, because that is a different instrument rather than a change to your site, and movement explained only by timing-derived checks, which shift run to run on a site nobody touched.
Want it on your own schedule, with Slack or a webhook instead of email? Score-drift monitoring is on every paid plan.
This score says whether an AI agent could read prosafesystems.com. AI traffic analytics says whether one actually came, and which pages turned it away.
Running AI agents of your own? AgentSpeed also monitors them in production: every run, its latency, cost, and failures, with alerts when something breaks. Free for 10,000 events a month, no credit card.
Paste into Claude Code, Cursor, or any assistant with your repository open. It carries this finding, the steps, and the shortcuts to avoid.
1 access agent(s) blocked: Amazonbot. These keep your site out of AI answers. 7 training-data crawler(s) blocked (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended, Bytespider, CCBot, Meta-ExternalAgent), a licensing choice, not scored.
Show me exactly what to dorobots.txt is a small text file at yoursite.com/robots.txt where you tell visiting robots what they may read. Many sites carry an old rule that blocks ALL robots, which now also blocks the AI assistants your customers ask for recommendations.
ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity each send a named crawler (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot). If your robots.txt turns them away, they cannot read your pages. So when a customer asks an assistant about your product, the assistant answers from what everyone ELSE says about you, or recommends a competitor it could read.
Visible text is 1.8% of HTML weight (6770/366872 bytes). 12% of the document is inline script, 36% is markup.
Show me exactly what to doOf everything your server sends for this page, very little is actual readable text. The rest is code, styling, and markup wrapper. Agents fetched a lot of bytes and found few words.
Agents work with retrieval budgets. A page that is 2% text either gets skimmed (and mis-summarised) or skipped. More signal per byte means more of your actual message survives into the agent’s summary.
Paste into Claude Code, Cursor, or any assistant with your repository open. It carries this finding, the steps, and the shortcuts to avoid.
Consent modal detected ([aria-label*="cookie" i]); content still visible. Verify the modal does not block first-paint for screenshot agents.
Show me exactly what to doWe found a cookie-consent banner in your page’s HTML. On a fail, there is so little page text alongside it that the banner is likely most of what an agent receives; on a warn, your content is present but the banner may still block the first paint for agents that render.
Agents can’t click Accept. When the banner is all the page serves, summaries come out as "this site asks for cookie consent" while your actual pitch sits behind a click that never happens.
Paste into Claude Code, Cursor, or any assistant with your repository open. It carries this finding, the steps, and the shortcuts to avoid.
TTFB 3717ms. Slow. Agents time out aggressively.
Show me exactly what to doTime to first byte is how long your server thinks before it starts answering: the gap between an agent asking for the page and the first byte of HTML arriving. Yours crossed our threshold (under 200ms scores full marks, over 2 seconds fails).
Agents fetch with tight timeouts and many pages in parallel. A server that takes seconds to start answering gets cut off mid-queue, and a page that times out is a page that was never read. Speed here is not polish; it decides whether the content gets fetched at all.
Paste into Claude Code, Cursor, or any assistant with your repository open. It carries this finding, the steps, and the shortcuts to avoid.
No valid MCP Server Card at /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json. Publish one so agents can discover your tools without HTML scraping.
Show me exactly what to doMCP (Model Context Protocol) is how AI assistants call tools. A server card is a small JSON file at /.well-known/mcp/server-card.json that announces "this site offers these tools" so an assistant can find them without scraping your pages. We requested that file from your site and found none.
Assistants that support MCP look for the card at that exact address. With one, "book an appointment on yoursite.com" can become a tool call instead of screen-driving your UI. This is an emerging standard, so it weighs little today; publishing early costs one static file and makes you visible to the assistants adopting it.
One prompt covering the fixes above that have a step-by-step plan, in the same priority order, with the same guardrails.
Right now, only you know this score. Your buyers ask AI before they buy, and certification is how you show them, and anyone comparing you to a competitor, that assistants can actually read, quote, and use your site.
Sites under 70 can’t buy this at any price. That’s what makes displaying it mean something.
Certify prosafesystems.com for $199/year →This scan shows whether an agent can read the site. One free probe asks a real assistant a real buying question and records who it cited.
Paste into Claude Code, Cursor, or any assistant with your repository open. It carries this finding, the steps, and the shortcuts to avoid.
Paste into Claude Code, Cursor, or any assistant with your repository open. It carries this finding, the steps, and the shortcuts to avoid.