thekitchn.com

Of everything your server sends for this page, very little is actual readable text. The rest is code, styling, and markup wrapper. Agents fetched a lot of bytes and found few words.

Agents work with retrieval budgets. A page that is 2% text either gets skimmed (and mis-summarised) or skipped. More signal per byte means more of your actual message survives into the agent’s summary.

1. Confirm your real copy is server-rendered. See the JavaScript check; these two usually fail together.
2. Cut boilerplate wrappers: deeply nested divs, inline SVG logos repeated per section, base64 images inlined into HTML.
3. Move large inline styles and scripts into external files.
4. Check how much of the document is inline script: your report now says. If most of it is, that is your framework serializing state for hydration, often a second copy of text already in the HTML. Send only the props a component cannot recompute, and render statically where a page does not need to hydrate.

• Re-scan: "Text-to-markup ratio" improves, and "Page weight" often improves alongside.

• Don’t pad the page with keyword text to inflate the ratio. The ratio is a proxy for substance, and stuffing is the opposite of substance.

Your page’s actual content (headlines, product info, pricing) only appears after JavaScript runs in a browser. Most AI agents read the raw HTML that arrives FIRST, and for your site, that first delivery is nearly empty.

An agent fetching your page gets the skeleton: navigation links, a footer, loading placeholders. It then summarises your business from a skeleton. Sites in this state get described as "this page contains little information" while the full pitch renders only for humans.

1. Next.js: Render primary content on the server: use Server Components (App Router) or getServerSideProps/SSG (Pages Router). Avoid fetching above-the-fold content in a client useEffect, since agents don’t run it.
2. Server-render the content that matters: hero copy, value proposition, pricing, product details.
3. Next.js: use Server Components or static generation for marketing pages. Don’t fetch above-the-fold content in a client useEffect.
4. Quick self-test: view the page source (Ctrl+U shows the raw HTML, not the inspector) and search for your headline. If it isn’t there, agents don’t see it.

• Your headline and pricing appear in the raw page source.
• Re-scan: "Content without JavaScript" flips, and "Text-to-markup ratio" usually improves with it.
• The "What the agent receives" section below shows exactly what a no-JS agent gets from your page.

• Don’t serve a special pre-rendered version only to detected bots (cloaking). Agents compare notes with real user agents, and a divergence gets you classified as deceptive.
• Don’t paste an HTML copy of the content into a hidden div as a workaround. Duplicated content that drifts from the rendered version fails coherence in the ugliest way.

We found a cookie-consent banner in your page’s HTML. On a fail, there is so little page text alongside it that the banner is likely most of what an agent receives; on a warn, your content is present but the banner may still block the first paint for agents that render.

Agents can’t click Accept. When the banner is all the page serves, summaries come out as "this site asks for cookie consent" while your actual pitch sits behind a click that never happens.

1. Render the page content first; show the banner alongside or over a corner of it, not as a wall that gates the HTML.
2. Check your consent vendor’s settings. Most have a non-blocking layout option.
3. Crawlers aren’t legal consent subjects, and many consent platforms have a "don’t gate known bots" setting you can enable.

• Re-scan: "Cookie wall blocks content" flips, and the "What the agent receives" section shows your real content instead of the banner.

• Don’t drop legally required consent to pass a scan. The fix is layout (banner beside content), not removing compliance.
• Don’t serve a bannerless page only to bots while humans get the wall; make the CONTENT reachable in both cases.

Headings (H1, H2, H3…) are the page’s outline. Yours skip levels, repeat H1s, or use styled text instead of real heading tags, so the outline machines extract is scrambled.

Agents use the heading tree to navigate long pages and to decide which section answers a question. A broken tree means quotes get attributed to the wrong section, or sections are missed entirely.

1. Exactly one H1 per page: the page’s actual title.
2. Nest without skipping: H2 for sections, H3 for subsections. Never jump H1 to H4 for visual size.
3. If a heading looks right but is a styled <div>, make it a real <h2> and adjust CSS. Machines only see tags.

• Re-scan: "Heading hierarchy" flips to PASS.

• Don’t pick heading levels for their font size; style with CSS and keep levels semantic.

Content-Signal is a newer robots.txt directive (pushed by Cloudflare) that lets you state a granular AI policy: for example "don’t train on my content, but summarising it in answers is fine". Classic robots.txt only offers all-or-nothing per crawler; this adds the middle ground. We looked for a Content-Signal line in your robots.txt and response headers and found none.

Without a granular signal, crawlers infer your intent from blunt allow/block rules, and sites often block more than they mean to just to avoid training use. A declared signal lets you keep answer visibility (summaries, citations) while opting out of what you object to. This is an emerging standard: honoring is voluntary and adoption is early, which is why it is flagged as emerging and weighs little.

1. Decide your actual policy first: are you fine with AI training on your content? With summarisation in answers? With search indexing?
2. Express it as one line in robots.txt, for example: Content-Signal: ai-train=no, ai-summarize=yes.
3. Keep your existing User-agent rules; the signal adds nuance on top, it doesn’t replace them.

• Open yoursite.com/robots.txt and confirm the Content-Signal line is live.
• Hit Re-scan above: "Content-Signal directives" flips to PASS.

• Don’t declare signals that contradict your User-agent rules, such as ai-summarize=yes while blocking every AI crawler; conflicting instructions get you treated as unreliable.
• Don’t add the line just for the score. It is a public policy statement; say what you mean, because compliant crawlers will act on it.